What companies actually do, not what they claim.
The information needed to judge a company’s integrity already exists: in filings, court records, news in dozens of languages, NGO investigations and its own published claims. It is simply unreadable at human scale. Integrity Monitor makes it readable, and links every finding back to the source it came from.
Due diligence is manual, fragmented and reactive
A manufacturer can manage relationships with many suppliers across several continents, each under a different regulatory regime and exposed to different risks. The information needed to assess them is scattered across regulatory filings, news in dozens of languages, macroeconomic reports, patent registries, NGO monitoring databases and commercial registries, much of it unstructured, more than any analyst team can read.
So researching a single critical supplier can take procurement and compliance teams considerable time, and still capture only part of what is publicly known. Meanwhile the consequences of missing something have grown sharper on three fronts at once.
Regulation turned supply-chain knowledge into an obligation
The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive requires large companies to report on sustainability, including material information about their value chain. The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive requires the largest companies to identify and address human-rights and environmental impacts in their chains of activities. The Digital Product Passport will add product data requirements, category by category. The 2026 Omnibus I revision narrowed who is in scope and pushed dates back, but for those still in scope the obligations stand, and since 27 September 2026 the ban on misleading green claims applies to every trader selling to consumers.
What reputation damage costs: the evidence is mixed
Major scandals have had measurable effects: after the ComROAD fraud, KPMG Germany’s other clients lost about 3% in value and more clients left the firm (Weber, Willenborg and Zhang, 2008). But a broad study of 110 media-covered events affecting the US Big Four between 2007 and 2019 found no systematic investor reaction and client losses that were short-lived and economically small, if larger where competition was higher and switching easier (Ege, Wang and Xu, 2025). Whether supply-chain relationships, with lower switching costs, are more exposed is plausible but not yet measured.
Smaller companies feel it through their customers
Large multinationals build dedicated teams of ESG analysts and compliance officers. The small and medium enterprises that form the backbone of European industry cannot. They are outside the main directives, but they receive information requests from customers that are in scope, and the rules on green claims apply to them directly.
An intelligence cycle that runs itself, and shows its work
Integrity Monitor automates the path from raw public information to a decision a professional can defend: systematic acquisition, semantic processing, multidimensional scoring, conversational querying and continuous alerting.
Acquire
Real-time news feeds, regulatory filings, macroeconomic databases, patent registries and companies’ own published claims, ingested continuously rather than gathered by hand for one report.
Understand
Language models read documents in many languages to extract entities, relationships and claims; a knowledge graph connects them, so exposure through a second- or third-tier supplier becomes visible.
Ground
Answers are generated from retrieved, indexed documents (retrieval-augmented, with sources cited), not from a model’s recollection. If it isn’t in a document, it isn’t in the answer.
Score
Findings roll into a multidimensional index with trends over time, where every component links back to the article, filing or claim that produced it.
Monitor
Assessment is not a one-off. Sources are re-harvested, results are compared, and material change raises an alert on the entities you watch.
Report
Structured reports and exports for the audit file, the compliance officer and the disclosure that regulation now requires.
Five dimensions of counterparty integrity
A reputation score that cannot be taken apart is worth little. Ours decomposes into five dimensions, each assessed from evidence that can be inspected.
Financial stability
Credit signals, liquidity, profitability and leverage, drawn from filings for listed counterparties and from registries and trade sources for private ones, benchmarked against the sector.
Compliance
Certifications and their validity, licences and permits, enforcement actions, cross-referenced with international and NGO monitoring of labour and human-rights standards.
Supply-chain stability
Concentration by geography and commodity, and country-level exposure assessed with OECD, IMF, World Bank and BIS data: political stability, conflict, disaster risk, logistics reliability.
ESG
Declared environmental and social commitments checked against independent reporting, NGO findings, regulatory action and investigative journalism, greenwashing and social-washing detection by design.
Strategy & innovation
R&D investment, patent activity, research collaboration, and demonstrated resilience: continuity planning, client diversification, adaptability through past disruption.
One product shipped. The platform follows it.
We ship narrow and prove it works before widening. What is available is available today; what is not is labelled as such.
Reputation Index
Screens a brand’s environmental claims against Directive (EU) 2024/825, flags each one with the exact legal provision it trips, verifies the evidence behind it, and abstains when the facts aren’t established. Built for consultancies, audit firms and legal teams, now that the directive applies (since 27 September 2026).
See the product →Supplier due diligence
The five-dimension assessment applied to a counterparty: financial health, compliance record, chain stability, ESG conduct and innovation capacity, assembled into one sourced profile.
Portfolio monitoring
Continuous watch over a portfolio of suppliers or brands, with change detection and alerting when something material moves, extending the monitoring already shipped inside Reputation Index.
CSRD & CS3D reporting support
Feeding the evidence gathered for assessment directly into value-chain disclosure, so the same work serves both the decision and the report.
Further jurisdictions
Rule catalogs beyond EU and Italian law, and source coverage extended to the markets that European supply chains actually depend on.
Credibility is a construction, not a claim
These four rules are why a professional can put their name on our output. They are enforced in the product, not promised in the marketing.
Every finding carries its source
A conclusion without a traceable document behind it does not ship. Quotes are verified verbatim against the source; anything that fails is rejected, and the rejection is shown rather than hidden.
We abstain when the evidence is absent
“Not determined” is a first-class answer. A confident wrong judgment is worse than no judgment, because someone acts on it. Absence of evidence is never reported as evidence of absence.
The law is code, not inference
Where a legal rule applies, it is implemented deterministically and versioned: same input, same result, reproducible for an audit file years later. Models read language; they never judge the law.
Every limit is disclosed
Uncalibrated scores say so. MVP-grade components say so. We do not quote accuracy figures that no ground-truth dataset could support. A tool that states what it cannot do is worth more than one that claims everything.
Anyone who has to answer for a counterparty
Enterprises & SMEs
Procurement and compliance teams that must assess suppliers with the rigour regulation now expects, including the smaller firms that never had an analyst team to do it.
Consultancies & auditors
Advisors who need defensible, citable evidence inside an engagement, and a method a client’s own lawyers can review line by line.
NGOs & institutions
Organisations investigating what sits behind corporate claims, who need the provenance trail as much as the finding.
- Advisor OnlineGreenwashing, scattano le nuove regole: 10 errori che possono costare fino a 10 milioniWhat it says →
- Il Sole 24 OreAsserzioni ambientali bocciate al 98%What it says →
- Il Sole 24 OreGreenwashing: ecco le 10 cose che un'azienda non deve fareWhat it says →
- Borsa ItalianaClima: Integrity Monitor, con nuove norme Ue rischio greenwashing su 98% claim aziendeWhat it says →
Talk to us
Directive (EU) 2024/825 has applied across the EU since 27 September 2026. We are working with consultancies, audit firms and companies on pilot engagements, tell us what you need.
Talk to us
Tell us what you need and we’ll come back to you. No newsletter, no drip sequence, a person reads this and replies.
We use your details only to answer this enquiry, not for marketing, unless you separately ask for it. See our privacy notice.